Abstract navy map of connected signals across a changing environment

Every engagement starts the same way: with the right questions, asked by the right people.

Field guide · Stakeholders, power and decision environments

The Influence Map

A stakeholder list tells you who exists. An influence map tells you how a decision can move.

Twenty-five pages on mapping the decision environment before anyone is contacted: authority, process, relationships, constraints and implementation. It replaces the two-axis power–interest grid with six separable layers you can use in part or in full.

Use the Decision Spine alone for a fast diagnostic, or build all six layers for a consequential engagement. The map is refreshed when the environment moves, not filed.

  • 25 pages
  • PDF
  • Free
  • 6 layers
  • 8 worksheets
Get the field guide
FIELD GUIDE · 2026The InfluenceMapA stakeholder list tells you who exists.An influence map tells you how a decision can move.ARTEFACT91Campaign Intelligence + Strategic Communicationsartefact91.com

What it is — and is not

A practical method

For institutional strategy, strategic communications, public affairs, partnerships, reputation work and complex change.

A living map

Positions, coalitions, incentives and routes of influence change as new information appears. The map is refreshed, not filed.

Not a predictive model

Scores and categories are structured judgment aids. They do not establish causal certainty or guarantee outcomes.

Not a licence to manipulate

Engagement should be truthful, proportionate, privacy-respecting and consistent with legal and ethical obligations.

What is inside

01

Decision Spine

Start with the choice that matters: outcome, decision, authority, process, veto, implementation.

02

Actor roles

Eight functional roles, mapped as functions rather than titles.

03

Influence profile

Six dimensions that teams usually collapse into the single word “power”.

04

Relationship network

How influence actually travels, including brokerage and absence.

05

Power

Visible, hidden and invisible power, plus legitimacy and urgency.

06

Engagement sequence

Engage in the order the decision requires, not contact-everyone.

07

Evidence discipline

Observed fact separated from inference, with a confidence convention.

08

Dynamic mapping

Refresh triggers, and tracking movement rather than sentiment.

Templates built to be used in the room

1

Decision Spine

The decision, the authority, the process, the veto points and implementation.

2

Actor inventory

Every actor by function, not by title.

3

Six-dimension influence profile

Scored with the evidence recorded beside each score.

4

Relationship map evidence

The four properties that make a tie meaningful.

5

Power + salience review

Visible, hidden and invisible power, with legitimacy and urgency.

6

Engagement sequence

Who first, who next, and why in that order.

7

Engagement brief

One actor, one objective, one interaction type.

8

Map refresh log

What changed, when, and what it changes about the strategy.

The templates are compact by design. Copy them into your own workspace and pre-fill everything that can be known in advance.

What it is built on

The method draws on established stakeholder-analysis, policy-influence, power-analysis and network-analysis traditions. The six-layer structure, the eight functional roles and the six-dimension profile are Artefact91 synthesis: facilitation and judgment aids rather than validated scientific scales, and the guide says so on the page where each one appears.

  • Bryson (2004) — stakeholder identification and analysis techniques
  • Reed et al. (2009) — a typology of stakeholder analysis methods
  • Mitchell, Agle & Wood (1997) — stakeholder salience: power, legitimacy, urgency
  • Gaventa (2006) — the Power Cube and power analysis
  • Battaglini & Patacchini (2019) — social networks in policy making
  • Varone, Ingold & Jourdain (2026) — policy advocacy through social network analysis
  • ODI — stakeholder analysis and the Alignment, Interest and Influence Matrix
  • UK Government Analysis Function — stakeholder mapping
  • World Bank — interest and influence matrices in engagement planning
  • World Health Organization (2026) — RCCE stakeholder analysis and community engagement

Influence analysis needs boundaries, and the guide sets them: no fabricated positions, endorsements or coalitions; no unlawful or disproportionate use of personal data; no institutional communications disguised as independent activity. If you want the picture tested against a live decision, the gap check shows where it is thin. Or bring us the situation you are facing.

{

Bring us the situation

}

WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO MOVE?

Romain Williams, CEO of Artefact91

Romain Williams

CEO, Artefact91

You do not need a finished brief. Tell us what is happening, what needs to change, what decision you are approaching and what you are worried might happen. We can start there.

{

Bring us the situation

}

WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO MOVE?

Romain Williams, CEO of Artefact91

Romain Williams

CEO, Artefact91

You do not need a finished brief. Tell us what is happening, what needs to change, what decision you are approaching and what you are worried might happen. We can start there.

{

Bring us the situation

}

WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO MOVE?

Romain Williams, CEO of Artefact91

Romain Williams

CEO, Artefact91

You do not need a finished brief. Tell us what is happening, what needs to change, what decision you are approaching and what you are worried might happen. We can start there.